Episodes
First Broadcast | Repeated | Comments |
---|---|---|
20080804 | Mark Whitaker investigates the tarnished image of a flawed process. Peer Review is supposed to be the keystone of quality control for research projects and academic studies, yet evidence of its many deficiencies has been building up for over 20 years. American lawyers have started challenging expert witnesses on the basis that peer review no longer guarantees their expertise. Yet accurate peer review in fields such as medicine can be a matter of life and death.
Contributors:
Prof Drummond Rennie, deputy editor Journal of the American Medical Association (OCNF)
A Square Dog production for BBC Radio 4.
Mark Whitaker investigates the tarnished image of a flawed scientific process. | |
20080804 | 20100318 (R4) | Mark Whitaker investigates the tarnished image of a flawed process. Peer Review is supposed to be the keystone of quality control for research projects and academic studies, yet evidence of its many deficiencies has been building up for over 20 years. American lawyers have started challenging expert witnesses on the basis that peer review no longer guarantees their expertise. Yet accurate peer review in fields such as medicine can be a matter of life and death.
Contributors:
Prof Drummond Rennie, deputy editor Journal of the American Medical Association (OCNF)
A Square Dog production for BBC Radio 4.
Mark Whitaker investigates the tarnished image of a flawed scientific process. |